sample report

Mobile app · A real idea · All sample reports

69/100

Is there demand for an app that reminds renters of lease deadlines and deposit rules?

Mixed signal: real discussion, weak evidence of action. Test willingness to pay before building.

measured 2026-09-10

Strongest signal

80% of 46 signals express real pain, read across 4 live sources.

Biggest risk

Crowded field: multiple existing tools/alternatives referenced — commoditization / race-to-zero risk.

Sharpest next step

Next: this is a published sample — run the same read on your own idea. The free scan takes about a minute.

4sources consulted live46signals readUScountryENlanguage
plan ›1 of 5 planned sources read US specifically; the other 4 read worldwide communities.Sources planned: dataforseo · hackernews · stackexchange_android · stackexchange_apple · stackexchange_softwarerecs
model-assisted read
the words we searched ›app reminds renters · lease renewal reminder app · tenant deadline tracker app · security deposit return deadline · landlord not returning deposit · how to get deposit back · move out notice period rules · rent increase notice deadline · tenant rights app · state security deposit laws · fed up with landlord deposit · is there an app for renters
  • DataForSEO (search intent / Trends)answered
  • Hacker News (Algolia)answered
  • Android Enthusiasts (Stack Exchange)answered
  • Ask Different (Apple) (Stack Exchange)nothing to say
  • Software Recommendations (Stack Exchange)answered

Evidence-linked heuristics. No market-size number is invented — every claim traces to a cited signal. Absence of a red flag is not proof of demand.

01

Is there real demand?

measured
Signals / sources
46 / 4
Pain ratio
80%
Confidence
medium (0.481)
ceiling lifted by measured intent: dataforseo found 140 monthly searches across 12 keywords (US)
Coverage
measured
23/46
Competition
medium

Measured search volume — real, not invented

landlord not returning deposit30/mo

Google Ads volumes, trailing 12 months. The only numbers on this page we did not read in a thread, and they are labelled.

Strongest cited thread — verbatim, verified

If you've ever rented a place, you've probably worried about your security deposit. You take move-in photos, cross your fingers at move-out, and hope the landlord doesn't decide the scuff on the wall is "$400 worth of damage."
hackernewsread the thread ↗match strength 0.6

Top evidence — cited

  • hackernews2▲Show HN: DepositGenie – stop unfair deductions with photos and AI reports
02

Is anyone acting — or just talking?

measured

Each signal counted once, under its strongest register. This reads the words people used — it is not a forecast.

  • would pay0
  • actively looking0
  • already coping, badly0
  • just frustrated1

1 of 18 pain signals used language we could classify; the rest carry pain the words did not label.

03

Can you own the name?

verified live

Proposed names

leasenudge

Available — verified, best first

  • leasenudge.comavailable 🔒 price in full report
  • leasenudge.appavailable 🔒 price in full report
  • rentping.appavailable 🔒 price in full report
  • deadlinedwell.comavailable 🔒 price in full report
  • deadlinedwell.appavailable 🔒 price in full report
  • leasealert.appavailable 🔒 price in full report
  • depoguard.appavailable 🔒 price in full report

What would kill it

  • Naming is necessary, not sufficient: a free domain does not clear trademark or social handles — run a trademark + handle check before committing (not performed here).
04

What would kill it?

Checkable against the evidence above

Each of these recomputes from the signals this run cited — you can go and disagree with the data.

  • Crowded field: multiple existing tools/alternatives referenced — commoditization / race-to-zero risk.

Reasoned by the model, not measured

These come from a language model reading the same evidence. They may name figures, companies or products that this run did NOT verify — treat them as leads to check, never as findings.

  • Direct competitor already exists and is being shown on HN (DepositGenie), solo founder building nearly identical deposit-protection tool with photos + AI reports — market awareness/first-mover advantage may already be lost, and differentiation would need to be substantial.
  • Willingness to pay is inherently thin and episodic: renters only care intensely about deposit/lease deadlines a few times per tenancy (move-in, renewal, move-out), making subscription monetization hard — usage is bursty, not habitual, undermining recurring revenue models.
  • Core value prop (know your rights, document damage, push back on landlords) is already served by free/low-cost community and informational sources — HN threads reference free tools like 'Rate The Landlord', 'Occupry', and general advice ('signing a lease doesn't waive tenant privileges'), suggesting users can get much of this value without paying an app.
  • State-specific legal content (deposit deadlines, allowable deductions, interest requirements) requires ongoing legal research and updates across 50 states — a solo operator faces a heavy, continuous compliance/maintenance burden to keep rules accurate, with real liability risk if advice is wrong or outdated.
  • Landlord-tenant law is hyperlocal (varies by city/county in addition to state, e.g., rent control cities), meaning a 'state-specific' ruleset may still be too coarse to be reliably actionable, risking user distrust or bad outcomes if local nuances are missed.
  • Comments highlight adversarial landlord dynamics (eviction policy tightening, tenant screening tightening in response to tenant-protection tools) — landlords could view rate/tracking tools as adversarial, potentially triggering blacklisting or reduced landlord cooperation, which could indirectly hurt the renter user base or invite pushback/legal threats against the app.

What this read could not establish

  • 5 cited threads verified · 1 shown here — the full report shows them all
  • 5 context signals counted — shown in the full report
  • +5 more names in the full report

What ran — and what is still locked

01 · Demand

Community signal from the problem alone. Ran on this free pass.

02 · Commerce

No marketplace read — this kind of idea does not sell through product listings, so we did not spend a section on one.

Not applicable

03 · Hyperlocal / neighborhood

No on-the-ground read — this idea is not delivered in one place, so a catchment area is not what decides it.

Not applicable
The city is the only answer that unlocks this entire paid section. Without a city we refuse to invent a place — the section stays closed.

04 · Brand & domain

Names proposed; domains recommended only after a real registry check.

Measured

Angles

Where to attack — the theme cut the evidence actually separates. Part of the paid report.

Locked

Where to serve

Countries ranked by what we can actually measure and serve there. Part of the paid report.

Locked

What we did not run, and why

Every axis this report does not carry, named with its reason. An axis that does not apply to your idea is not a gap in the read.

  • No on-the-ground read — this idea is not delivered in one place, so a catchment area is not what decides it.
  • No marketplace read — this kind of idea does not sell through product listings, so we did not spend a section on one.

What the full report would have added to this read

For your idea, the full report contains:

  • all 5 cited threads we verified — real URLs with the verbatim quote the engine checked (the free scan shows 1)
  • no angle — the evidence does not concentrate on one theme, so the report lists what was tested and set aside rather than naming a direction it cannot back
  • 90 countries ranked by where you can actually serve
  • no marketplace read — this kind of idea does not sell through listings
  • first-year price on 7 available domains

Every line above is what this sample measured. Your idea gets the same read, on the same sources, today.

Scan my idea

Other samples in this class

The same idea, read in another language and country