Threads from the communities where your users complain about the current way — quoted verbatim and linked, so you can read them yourself.
How we know: a quote must match its source or we drop it. Every citation opens.For a SaaS, a tool, an app
Before you build: is the pain real, or just plausible?
The communities where your users already complain, quoted and verified — with measured search demand behind it, and the alternatives your own evidence names.
What the report measures for a software idea
Each mechanism below is visible in the report itself — we show the verification, not just the claim.
Who says they would pay, who is actively looking, who is coping badly — separated, because the three are not the same signal.
How we know: only signals that are actually about your idea feed any scored quantity; a blind source says so instead of faking a score.The alternatives your own evidence names — with the quotes that name them, not a vendor list we assembled.
How we know: read out of the threads themselves; a competitor nobody mentioned is not in your report.Name ideas checked against the live domain registry — a domain is only ever called available after a real check, never guessed.
How we know: checked against the live registry on every scan.What we deliberately do not do for a software idea
There is no marketplace read here — a tool is not sold on a shelf, so the report says the axis does not apply instead of rendering an empty section. If we cannot measure your idea at all, refund eligibility is read from the scan’s own recorded state, not judged by a support queue — the refund is then issued to your card by hand.
Read a real scan of this kind first
Free scan first. The full report only if the free read earns it.
The free scan shows the demand read and exactly what the full report would add for your idea. No subscription, the link stays yours.